![]() Whenever you're using a legit array object and using one of the standard methods of manipulating that array you're going to be hitting the underlying array data. The indexed values in an array are stored differently from any properties you decide to set on the array object that represents the underlying array data. Properties can be stored on an array object but this simply demonstrates how JavaScript insists on making everything an object. The reason this separation even exists is because the JS engines themselves store the two differently. That's why there's a multitude of articles on methods of trying to make a semi-fake Array-like object that behaves like one but allows other functionality. In terms of identifying an array from an object (dictionary), JS engines have always made explicit lines between the two. At the underlying engine level this allows for a lot more optimization in terms of organizing the memory that represents the structure. An item in an array isn't able to be customized in this way: it either exists or it doesn't. You can create properties with setters/getters, with differing enumerability, writability, and configurability. See GDC 2012: From Console to Chrome for more.Īt a basic level that stays within the realms of JavaScript, properties on objects are much more complex entities. Updated Note (dec 2012): Google representatives have videos on youtubes describing the inner workings of chrome itself (like when it switches from a linkedlist array to a fixed array, etc), and how to optimize them. ![]() Also the test is huge, hence I yet to fully analyze and evaluate the results : please edit it in =) Note 2: These wonderful performance results are not shared across browsers, especially More details can be seen extensively across several google IO videos. There can be very isolated optimised performance cases for array/object size less then an arbitrary size (24?). Note: These metrics applies only to large array/objects which v8 does not "entirely optimise out". BIGGEST SURPRISE of it all, V8 array writes are slightly faster than V8 reads =O.unsurprisingly, the divLinkedList is inferior to an array on all sectors, except dll.splice(index,1) removal (Where it broke the test system).Surprisingly, Array.splice(index,1,data) has been optimized (no length change) and is 100x faster than just splice Array.splice(index,0,data).Unsurprisingly, mid array Array.splice(index,0,data) is slow, very slow.Surprisingly Nulling a value in an object is obj = null ~approx 2x slower than just deleting the attribute delete obj. ![]() Nulling the value array = null is faster than deleting it delete array (undefined) in an array by ~approx 4x++ faster.Array.unshift(data) is slower as expected, and is ~approx 5x slower than a new property adding.Amusingly, Array.push( data ) is faster than Array = data by almost 20 (dynamic array) to 10 (fixed array) times over. ![]() Surprisingly Array.shift() is fast ~approx 6x slower than an array pop, but is ~approx 100x faster than an object attribute deletion.Array push / pop / shift is ~approx 20x+ faster than any object equivalent.(Currently down, rebuilt in progress) More details on my blog regarding this. I created a test suite, precisely to explore these issues (and more) ( archived copy).Īnd in that sense, you can see the performance issues in this 50+ test case tester (it will take a long time).Īlso as its name suggest, it explores the usage of using the native linked list nature of the DOM structure. what about this.? var arr = įor conventional arrays, the performance would be terrible whereas, if a LinkedList was used. Also, in what context does the V8 engine "know" to "switch-over" to another data structure?įor example, suppose I create an array with. :)ĮDIT: I am really wondering how JavaScript arrays and objects work under the hood. More specifically, what it the performance impact of:Īny articles or links for more details would be appreciated, as well. What is the precise performance of Array/Object retrievals and manipulations in JavaScript? (specifically for Google V8) slow random indexing, fast removal/insertion at the beginning/end) And, maybe sometimes they are stored as linked lists (i.e. And, other times, they are treated more like Objects (fast indexing, fast insertion/removal, more memory). fast random indexing, slow deletion and resizing). I also understand that Arrays are sometimes treated like C++ Arrays (i.e. If there are a lot of properties, it is sometimes treated as a hash table? I understand that some Objects use classes as their underlying data structure. I find no comprehensive article on this topic anywhere on the Internet. Performance associated with Arrays and Objects in JavaScript (especially Google V8) would be very interesting to document.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |